Art Institute of Chicago to Return Painting Lost in Nazi-Era Forced Sale

The Art Institute of Chicago is returning Jean Metzinger’s Woman with a Fan to the heirs of Jewish collector Emanuel Lewenstein after new research connected the painting to a forced sale during the Nazi occupation of the Netherlands.

Announced on September 22, 2026, the decision concerns a work painted in 1913 and acquired by the Chicago museum in 1959. Its return follows an investigation into gaps in its ownership history, including what happened to it during World War II.

The museum worked with Mondex Corporation, a Toronto-based firm representing the Lewenstein heirs, to establish the connection between the artwork and the family’s collection.

A history interrupted by persecution

According to The Art Newspaper, Lewenstein purchased the painting from art dealer Paul Citroen in 1928. After Lewenstein’s death, his widow is believed to have placed it, along with other works, at Amsterdam’s Stedelijk Museum for safekeeping.

By the time it appeared at auction in October 1940, his widow had also died and his children had emigrated. The Netherlands had been invaded by Nazi Germany earlier that year.

The precise circumstances of the auction and the identity of the person who consigned the painting remain uncertain. However, the museum concluded that its sale resulted from Nazi persecution and should therefore be treated as a forced sale.

That distinction matters: an auction record can document a transaction without demonstrating that the family freely chose to part with its property.

A clue on the back of the canvas

Researchers found an important lead by examining the painting itself. Infrared photography made faint pencil writing on the reverse readable, revealing Citroen’s name and opening a route into the work’s earlier history.

WBEZ reported that the investigation also drew on historical documents, including an auction catalog and a Dutch newspaper article from 1940. Details such as the painting’s dimensions helped researchers match those records to the work in Chicago.

The case illustrates how physical examination and archival evidence can complement each other. A mark that offers little information on its own can become significant when compared with sales records and other surviving documents.

From the European art market to Chicago

The painting reappeared on the Dutch art market in the 1950s and passed through galleries in Paris and New York before entering the Art Institute’s collection. Its acquisition was credited as a gift of Mr. and Mrs. Sigmund Kunstadter.

Its presence in a museum did not close the questions surrounding its past. Further research eventually provided evidence that changed the institution’s understanding of how the work had left the Lewenstein collection.

As of the announcement, the painting was no longer on display. The museum told WBEZ that arrangements were being made with art handlers to send it to the collector’s living heirs.

What the return means

Provenance is the history of an artwork’s ownership. In cases involving wartime persecution, researching that history also means examining the conditions under which ownership changed.

A painting’s journey can be described through dates, dealers and museum acquisitions. Yet those records also intersect with the lives of families whose choices were restricted by discrimination, displacement and violence.

Returning Woman with a Fan gives the Lewenstein heirs authority over its future. The announcement does not undo the persecution that separated the family from the painting, but it recognizes that history through a concrete action.

For the museum, the decision demonstrates how new evidence can lead to a reassessment of an established collection. For the family, it reconnects an object with an ownership history that had remained unresolved for decades.

Sources: WTTW, WBEZ and The Art Newspaper, September 22, 2026.